
Download the MS Word document here.
Here's the question we worked with on Wed. 11.3.09:
“What happens in fiction is what distinguishes it…” Using at least two works, show how far your interest in novels and short stories has been based on the events and how much of your interest has been in other aspects?
Here are the notes preparing a thesis statement:
For 2 (TWO) of the quotations below, explain the significance of each passage. Relate it to a theme, the development of character or the development of conflict.
For each passage, you must cover the needed analysis in less than 200 words.
10A: Due Tuesday10 February.
10B: Due Wednesday 11 February.
"Some Cupid kills with arrows, some with traps." (III, i)
"If I see anything tonight why I should not marry her tomorrow, in the congregation where I should wed, there will I shame her." (III, ii)
"Yet Benedick was such another, and now is he become a man. He swore he would never marry; and yet now in despite of his heart he eats his meat without grudging. And how you may be converted I know not; but methinks you look with your eyes as other women do." (III, v)
"There is a kind of merry war betwixt Signior Benedick and her. They never meet but there's a skirmish of wit between them." (I, i)
Leonato provides exposition for the relationship between Benedick and Beatrice and one of the conflicts of the play, and sets the tone for that conflict. Leonato’s use of war as a metaphor is apt since Benedick is a soldier, and foreshadows the contrast between being a soldier and a lover as discussed later in the play. The paradox of a 'merry war' sums up a view of love: that it is competitive, but at the same time light. This sets the context for the relationship between the two characters and lets the audience know that their respective jibes are not to be taken seriously. Beatrice has already made insulting comments regarding Benedick (contrasting the praise the messenger has heaped on him), and so the audience sees her as a shrew, but Leonato's explanation contextualizes her behaviour and makes it less threatening. Leonato follows this exposition with the further explanation that they engage in a 'skirmish of wit' when they meet, and Beatrice’s play on words on the lost wits of Benedick illustrate her use of wit. This is contrasted in the scene with Hero’s lack of verbal interaction generally, encouraging the audience to see Hero and Beatrice as foils.
199 words
For each of the quotations below, explain the significance of each passage. Relate it to a theme, the development of character or the development of conflict.
For each passage, you must cover the needed analysis in less than 200 words.
You will be delivering a performance of part of a scene from Macbeth and analyzing your own performance in a character/interpretation assignment. Here are the rules:
thesis statement: While the behaviour of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth demonstrate a conflict between emotion and reason, Shakespeare shows that emotion is more powerful.
In conclusion, the behaviour of M and LM shows the superiority of emotion over reason in the play. But can that be true in our modern world? Yes, reason plays an important role in all decision making, but emotion is needed to provide the human aspect that ends up being so important to us. We as people are not only rational but also emotional by our nature: to ignore this is to risk making our lives tragedies, like Macbeth.
You will write a four-paragraph essay, following the provided outline. In each paragraph, use the best possible structure, and provide examples whenever appropriate. Also, use transitions between paragraphs to explain the relationships between the ideas.
Choose one of the conflicts of the play we have identified:
• appearance / reality
• ambition / honor
• fate / will
• guilt / amorality
You will explore what the play has to say about that conflict.
Introduction: Find an interesting way to introduce the conflict generally, put the conflict in the play and end with a thesis statement.
Thesis statement: In a single sentence, explain what you will say about the conflict, including the structure of the two body paragraphs.
Body paragraph one: Show the presence of the conflict throughout the play. Use examples and use the key words from your thesis statement to analyze those examples.
Body paragraph two: Explain how Shakespeare resolves the conflict. Use examples (probably from the last act or two) and analyze.
Conclusion: Restate the thesis briefly and express your own ideas about that conflict in the real world.
Rules
Essays should be 500-1000 words long.
In the final draft, essays should be 1½ -spaced or double-spaced.
Due Dates
Tuesday, 20 January: complete working drafts reviewed in class
Thursday, 22 January: published essay due
Assessment
A: Content | B: Organization | C: Style & Language |
· Do show a perceptive understanding of the ideas from the novel? · Do you carefully choose details from the novel or other wise to support your ideas? · Do you discuss and analyze ideas in a manner which focuses on significant concepts in a sophisticated manner? | · Are the paragraphs organized in a way to focus on the main idea of the essay? · Are examples integrated in a sophisticated and focused manner? · Do transitions show cohesion and movement between paragraphs? | · Are you ‘following the rules’ of spelling, grammar and punctuation? · Do you use the right word for the right situation? · Are you using the language of literary analysis? |
In act 2 scene 2 of Macbeth, Shakespeare uses blood as a symbol of guilt in order to contrast for the audience how Macbeth and Lady Macbeth deal with the guilt over the death of Duncan. When Macbeth returns from having killed Duncan and finds blood on his hands, he worries about the ability to wash his hands clean. ‘Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this blood / Clean from my hand? No, this my hand will rather / The multitudinous seas in incarnadine, / Making the green one red.’ (II.ii.27-30) Shakespeare does this to show Macbeth’s strong sense of guilt over the act he has just performed. By saying that he doubts whether he can wash his hands clean, Macbeth symbolically shows his doubts that he will ever be free of the guilt over the murder. In fact, not only will his guilt be permanently on his hands, but it will make all of the sea red: this foreshadows the fact that Macbeth’s sense of guilt will affect not only him, but all of Scotland as it motivates his tyranny. On the other hand, Lady Macbeth has a totally different attitude about the blood and, symbolically, her sense of guilt. She says, ‘My hands are of your colour,’ but in contrast with Macbeth, assumes that ‘A little water clears us of this deed: / How easy is it, then!’ (II.ii.39-40) Lady Macbeth sees the guilt, symbolized by the blood on her hands, as insignificant; it can easily be washed away, forgotten, left behind. By having both characters talk about the blood on their hands, Shakespeare contrasts the two characters’ attitudes about guilt and the consequences of evil actions.
Association
One of the most common ways of selling a product is through association. With this technique, the product is linked to a desire to which the advertiser believes the target audience will have some attachment. In the 1971 Coca-Cola advertisement, the association is with idealism, unity and internationalism. Because the late 1960s and early 1970s were heavily influenced by the youth counter-culture movement of the anti-war protests and the ‘hippie lifestyle,’ these were ideas and desires that were important, especially to young people. Naturally, young people are the target audience of the ad. When the ad starts, a young woman is singing the song alone. Her natural appearance and the fact that she is looking off into the distant sky gives the impression of her sincerity and idealism. As the song continues, more people start singing with her, giving the impression that the song is gaining in strength as the voices, belonging to a group of people with various ethnicities and wearing clothing suggestive of national costumes. (I would then go on the describe the nature of the song, the outdoor setting, the girl at the end looking like she might cry, the slogan 'The Real Thing,' etc.)
ironic ad
Some advertisers will avoid the more mainstream advertising techniques and instead use ironic ads. Ironic ads make fun of traditional ads, and by so doing they make the consumer feel like the product trusts them. In other words, the consumer is treated like she is too smart to actually be advertised to. A classic example is the Volkswagen ‘Think Small’ campaign. Volkswagen wants to make a claim of a unique selling proposition, so they emphasize not only the differences between this car and other cars on the market, but also the differences between this ad and other car ads. For instance, the car is shown very small and on a neutral, white background, making it look somewhat ridiculous. Most car ads would show the car in great detail and in a highly associative context. The slogan ‘Think Small’ is the opposite of what one expects a car ad to say, thus making fun of that more traditional style of advertising. (Then you would keep writing about the other techniques in the ad.)
You will choose three techniques of advertising and create a poster, notebook or PowerPoint demonstrating how those techniques are used, analyzing specific ads that are examples of those techniques in use. You must include copies of the ads which you are analyzing.
Choose 2 of the following questions and answer them in structured, planned paragraphs. Aim for more than 200 words. Use specific references to the play with scene and line numbers. It would look like this: Macbeth says, “Two truths are told, as happy prologues to the swelling act of the imperial theme” (I.ii.126-128)
1. Discuss the significance of omens in this act.
2. What is Macbeth’s state of mind in either scene 1 or 2, and what specific techniques does Shakespeare use to establish it?
3. Discuss the symbolism of blood in scene two, and apply it to specific lines.
4. Is Lady Macbeth’s response to the deaths of the guards is sincere or pretended? Why do you think so, and what difference does it make in our understanding of her character?
DUE: Thurs. 27.11
Victorian poetry orals
Orals will be presented Tues. 18 and Wed. 19 November.
A: Content | B: Organization | C: Style & Language |
· Do your ideas show clarity, originality and creativity? · Do you support your ideas well? | · Does your paragraph have structure? · Do you move from idea to idea clearly? | · Are you ‘following the rules’ of spelling, grammar and punctuation? · Do you use the right word for the right situation? |
While the novelist shows the vulnerability and flexibility of individuality in different circumstances, people today still consider to what degree we are truly individuals and to what degree we are victims of our environment and circumstances. For instance, are career criminals just bad people, or are they bad because of the environments in which they were raised? Is the best way to deal with crime to isolate criminals because of their individual traits, or should we attempt to change the environments which sees to produce criminals? The issue of individuality and its real power is a something we still consider today.
Thesis: During wartime, social norms and rules are abandoned and replaced by practical and physical needs.
In the environment of war, social rules are easily abandoned. One social rule which is abandoned is respect for authority. Before the war, Paul and his friends respect Kantorek enough to join the army at his encouragement. However, when talking about people like Kantorek and their responsibility for the deaths of young recruits, he says, ‘[T]hat is the very root of their moral bankruptcy’ (9). In the environment of war, the idea that a headmaster ought to be respected merely because of his age and social position is easily discarded; the soldiers’ experiences have shown him to be wrong, and so the respect is unnecessary. Additionally, respect for human life is abandoned in war. In chapter nine, Paul finds himself in the shellhole with the French soldier he has killed, and he feels deep sympathy and guilt for his death, feelings we find consistent with social norms. However, as Paul returns to his own line, he finds that sympathy ridiculous, and his fellow soldiers agree. ‘What else could you do? That’s why you’re out here,’ they tell him (161). The requirements of the war environment make the normal sympathy in the face of the loss of human life wasteful and unnecessary. As Kat encourages Paul to watch the celebrating snipers, Paul finds it easy to abandon the social norm of respecting human life.
kilmer@ish © 2008. Blog design by Lucian E. Marin — Converted by Randomness!